Why T&S needs a Wikipedia-thon
Wikipedia is often the first stop for anyone trying to understand T&S and yet its coverage of the industry is woefully thin. It's time that was fixed
You might also like...
Oct
12
Social Reckoning is media literacy with a $30m budget
The critics don’t love the new Aaron Sorkin movie. Not that it really matters, that’s not the point of it.
7 min read
Oct
06
T&S workers are picking up the pen
For years, academics and lawyers have written the books that explain T&S to the public. A run of new titles from people who've done the work could change that. Here are six we're reading
7 min read
Oct
02
Anti-terrorism 'accountability theatre', Meta's Muse problem and Jess Davies vs xAI
The need-to-know developments shaping digital platforms, online speech and internet safety - edition #357
8 min read
Sep
28
[Revisited] Is it time to unite T&S and AI governance?
AI is now everywhere, but the teams managing its risks still sit apart from the people who have spent decades dealing with online harms. Eighteen months after first arguing they belong together, Alice updates her case.
7 min read
Sep
14
Now is the time to tell your T&S story (updated framework)
The current AI safety debate reminds us that Trust & Safety's expertise is needed more than ever. So why can't the industry get that expertise heard? And what can you do to start telling your own story?
7 min read