5 min read

Why Meta settled, Alice in vendor-land and Bill Gates on these "turbulent times"

The need-to-know developments shaping digital platforms, online speech and internet safety - edition #349

Hello and welcome to Everything in Moderation's Week in Review, your need-to-know news and analysis about platform policy, content moderation and internet regulation. It's written by me, Ben Whitelaw and supported by paid members like you.

Welcome to new free subscribers from Nextdoor, Caleb, Respectify.ai, Google, Media24, Microsoft, eSafety Commission and elsewhere. Plus a big thanks to paying EiM members that support the newsletter and get access to EiM’s professional guides that were recently described by one happy member as “well worth the subscription“.

The Meta settlement is the big story of the week (see: Platforms) but it’s not the only US legal case worth your attention. Hit reply with your comments and queries; thanks for reading — BW


Policies

New and emerging internet policy and online speech regulation

A fascinating and divisive ruling coming out of the US where a federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment protects someone's right to privately possess AI-generated child sexual abuse material in their own home, provided it doesn’t depict a real child. The decision emerged from the prosecution of a Wisconsin man charged in 2024 with using an AI image generator to produce explicit images of children. The Washington Post and others have the story.

Legal experts quoted in the WashPo story are split on how much this actually changes anything: Stanford's Riana Pfefferkorn notes it doesn't protect producing, downloading or transporting such material, only pure private possession, while Boston College's Daniel Lyons thinks there's a real chance the Supreme Court takes up the case given the volume of synthetic material now overwhelming NCMEC's reporting pipeline. One to watch carefully.

Also in this section...

Get access to the rest of this edition of EiM and 200+ others by becoming a paying member